From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blazic v. Walsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 5, 2002
300 A.D.2d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

90884

Decided and Entered: December 5, 2002.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Sullivan County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Radislaw Blazic, Elmira, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Nancy A. Siegel of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting inmates from refusing to obey a direct order and engaging in violent conduct. The Attorney General concedes, and our review of the record confirms, that there is insufficient evidence to support so much of the determination as found petitioner guilty of violent conduct. That part of the determination is, accordingly, annulled and the matter is remitted to the Commissioner of Correctional Services for a redetermination of the penalty imposed (see Matter of Delgado v. Hurlburt, 279 A.D.2d 734).

Substantial evidence was presented supporting the remainder of the determination wherein petitioner was found guilty of refusing to obey a direct order. Presented in evidence at the disciplinary hearing was the misbehavior report relating that petitioner ignored a correction officer's repeated orders to leave his cell and report to his job as an evening porter. The testimony of the reporting officer was consistent with this rendition of the facts and we find that there was sufficient evidence to support the determination of his guilt (see Matter of Cliff v. Brady, 290 A.D.2d 895, 895-896, lv dismissed, lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 642). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his assertion of hearing officer bias, have been examined and found to be without merit.

SPAIN, J.P., MUGGLIN, ROSE, LAHTINEN and KANE, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of violent conduct; petition granted to that extent and matter remitted to the Commissioner of Correctional Services for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision; and, as so modified, confirmed.


Summaries of

Blazic v. Walsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 5, 2002
300 A.D.2d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Blazic v. Walsh

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RADISLAW BLAZIC, Petitioner, v. JAMES J. WALSH, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 5, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
749 N.Y.S.2d 917

Citing Cases

Tafari v. McGinnis

Evidence presented at the disciplinary hearing included the misbehavior report, cosigned by two of the…