From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blaylock v. Jensen

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
May 16, 1941
44 Cal.App.2d 853 (Cal. Ct. App. 1941)

Opinion

Docket No. 13002.

May 16, 1941.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County on motion to tax costs. Ray B. Lyon, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

Fred A. Shaeffer and Wilbur D. Garber for Appellant.

Marion A. Smith, D.E. Ruppe and C.W. Bowers for Respondent.


A judgment in the sum of $500 was rendered by the superior court in favor of plaintiff and against defendant Mabel Coates. Thereafter plaintiff filed her memorandum of costs and disbursements and the defendant, objecting to certain items, filed her motion to have the costs taxed by the court. The court made an order striking various items claimed by plaintiff as proper disbursements. From this order plaintiff has appealed.

On a separate appeal, which was prosecuted by defendant from the judgment in plaintiff's favor, we have this day entered an order reversing the judgment for $500. The issue has therefore become moot.

The appeal is dismissed.

McComb, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Blaylock v. Jensen

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
May 16, 1941
44 Cal.App.2d 853 (Cal. Ct. App. 1941)
Case details for

Blaylock v. Jensen

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNYMAY BLAYLOCK, a Minor, etc., Appellant, v. JAMES JENSEN et al.…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: May 16, 1941

Citations

44 Cal.App.2d 853 (Cal. Ct. App. 1941)
113 P.2d 258

Citing Cases

Jonathan Neil v. Jones

Accordingly, and without further action by the trial court, the renewed judgment — because it is, legally,…