From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blaylock v. Dall. Area Rapid Transit

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Jul 28, 2023
3:22-CV-00627-N (BH) (N.D. Tex. Jul. 28, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-CV-00627-N (BH)

07-28-2023

ESCO LEWIS BLAYLOCK, III, Plaintiff, v. DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE REFERRED TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DAVID C. GODBEY CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. By separate judgment, the plaintiff's claims will be DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Blaylock v. Dall. Area Rapid Transit

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Jul 28, 2023
3:22-CV-00627-N (BH) (N.D. Tex. Jul. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Blaylock v. Dall. Area Rapid Transit

Case Details

Full title:ESCO LEWIS BLAYLOCK, III, Plaintiff, v. DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Jul 28, 2023

Citations

3:22-CV-00627-N (BH) (N.D. Tex. Jul. 28, 2023)

Citing Cases

Gibbons v. Brookside Props.

“A Title VII claim “cannot be brought against a non-employer.” Blaylock v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit, No.…