From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blaxton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Mar 26, 2012
85 So. 3d 1150 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 1D11–6308.

03-26-2012

Otis D. BLAXTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Otis D. Blaxton, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Charlie McCoy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Rehearing Denied May 3, 3012.

Otis D. Blaxton, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Charlie McCoy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court properly treated Appellant's "Petition for Writ of Mandamus: Contesting Judge Michael G. Allen's Prejudice" as a motion for disqualification, we treat Appellant's appeal as a writ of prohibition. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c) ; see also Sutton v. State, 975 So.2d 1073, 1076 (Fla.2008) ("[P]rohibition is ... clearly recognized as the proper avenue for immediate review of whether a motion to disqualify a trial judge has been correctly denied.").

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

DAVIS, THOMAS, and RAY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Blaxton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Mar 26, 2012
85 So. 3d 1150 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Blaxton v. State

Case Details

Full title:Otis D. BLAXTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Mar 26, 2012

Citations

85 So. 3d 1150 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Citing Cases

Forney v. Crews

The motion for disqualification of the trial judge and disposition by the trial court are not contained in…