From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blauvelt v. Gallagher

Supreme Court, Kings Special Term
Feb 1, 1898
22 Misc. 564 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1898)

Opinion

February, 1898.

Alfred R. Page, for motion.

Parsons, Shepard Ogden, opposed.


The wife is given the entire estate while she "lives and remains unmarried", to support herself and the children, and at her death to leave the "residue" to the children. She is not given the fee; but this direction as to the residue makes clear her power to consume the principal. The meaning therefore is that the estate is given to her for life, with power to consume the principal, but such estate and power to cease upon her remarrying. Meanwhile, however, the power to consume continues, and under it she may mortgage or sell (Swarthout v. Ranier, 143 N.Y. 499; Rose v. Hatch, 125 N.Y. 428). This mortgage having been made by her during widowhood, it therefore covered the fee.

Motion granted.


Summaries of

Blauvelt v. Gallagher

Supreme Court, Kings Special Term
Feb 1, 1898
22 Misc. 564 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1898)
Case details for

Blauvelt v. Gallagher

Case Details

Full title:CLARA BLAUVELT, Plaintiff, v . ELIZABETH GALLAGHER et al., Defendants

Court:Supreme Court, Kings Special Term

Date published: Feb 1, 1898

Citations

22 Misc. 564 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1898)
49 N.Y.S. 608

Citing Cases

Holeman v. Quick

The contract placed an absolute power of disposal in Caroline McMurray of the mortgage involved in this suit.…