From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BLAU v. AT&T Mobility

United States District Court, N.D. California
Oct 21, 2011
No. C 11-00541 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-00541 CRB.

October 21, 2011


ORDER GRANTING JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY


For the reasons stated in open court, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff sixty (60) days of jurisdictional discovery as to AT T Inc. At the conclusion of the sixty days, Plaintiff is to file a supplemental brief of no more than fifteen (15) pages as to whether it continues to assert that the Court has personal jurisdiction over AT T Inc. (and if so, why). AT T Inc. may respond with a brief of no more than fifteen (15) pages within two weeks of the filing of Plaintiff's supplemental brief. The Court takes under submission AT T Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (dkt. 36) and AT T Mobility and AT T Inc.'s Motion to Compel Arbitration (dkt. 38). The Court will rule on both motions once the supplemental jurisdictional briefing is complete.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

BLAU v. AT&T Mobility

United States District Court, N.D. California
Oct 21, 2011
No. C 11-00541 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2011)
Case details for

BLAU v. AT&T Mobility

Case Details

Full title:FREDRICK M. BLAU, Plaintiff, v. AT&T MOBILITY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Oct 21, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-00541 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2011)