From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BLAU v. AT&T Mobility

United States District Court, N.D. California
Oct 28, 2011
No. C 11-00541 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-00541 CRB.

October 28, 2011


ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS


For the reasons stated from the bench, the Court GRANTS in part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss as to Plaintiff Anthony Tran, see dkt. 37, such that:

1. The fraud claims are DISMISSED with leave to amend;

2. The fraud by concealment claim is DISMISSED with leave to amend;

3. The CLRA claim is DISMISSED with prejudice;

4. The breach of contract claims are DISMISSED with leave to amend;

5. The MMWA claim is DISMISSED with prejudice;

6. The FCA § 201(b) claim is DISMISSED with prejudice; and

7. The RICO claim is DISMISSED with leave to amend.

Plaintiff has 45 days to amend his Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

BLAU v. AT&T Mobility

United States District Court, N.D. California
Oct 28, 2011
No. C 11-00541 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)
Case details for

BLAU v. AT&T Mobility

Case Details

Full title:FREDRICK M. BLAU, Plaintiff, v. AT&T MOBILITY, ET AL., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Oct 28, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-00541 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)