From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blaty v. Blaty

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 27, 1983
443 So. 2d 297 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 83-843.

December 27, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Fredricka G. Smith, J.

Arnold Nevins, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Sams, Gerstein, Ward, Newman Beckham and Frank Newman, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and BASKIN, JJ.


The husband appeals the trial court's order (1) awarding the wife his interest in the marital home; (2) requiring the husband to provide the wife with a new car titled in her name; and (3) directing the husband to repay the $10,500 life insurance loan.

Upon careful review of the record, and mindful of the trial court's superior vantage point, we cannot reach the conclusion that no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the trial court. Determining, on the contrary, that reasonable persons could differ as to the propriety of the trial court's action, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court's order. Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So.2d 203 (Fla. 1983); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Blaty v. Blaty

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 27, 1983
443 So. 2d 297 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Blaty v. Blaty

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY J. BLATY, APPELLANT, v. DEANE BLATY, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 27, 1983

Citations

443 So. 2d 297 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Keesee v. Keesee

Lamas v. Lamas, 660 So.2d 765 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); GNB, Inc. v. United Danco Batteries, Inc., 627 So.2d 492…