From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blatt v. Shove

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
May 1, 2013
CASE NO. C11-1711RAJ (W.D. Wash. May. 1, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. C11-1711RAJ

05-01-2013

LEON S. BLATT, Plaintiff, v. PETE SHOVE, et al., Defendants.


HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES


ORDER

This matter comes before the court on two motions to dismiss. The first is from Defendant Brian Ashbach, the second is from Defendant Vance Odell. Plaintiff did not respond to Mr. Ashbach's motion to dismiss. For the reasons stated herein, the court GRANTS both motions (Dkt. ## 83, 84) and DISMISSES all claims against these two defendants with prejudice.

The court has already dismissed Plaintiff's claims invoking 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against these Defendants. Dkt. # 56 (Jul. 24, 2012 order). Plaintiff's attempt to restate claims against these Defendants fails. His response to Mr. Odell's motion to dismiss does not articulate any claim that avoids the reasoning of the court's July 24 order. In addition, he has no valid claim against these Defendants arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1985. He concedes that his claim invoking 42 U.S.C. § 1986 is untimely.

__________________________

The Honorable Richard A. Jones

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Blatt v. Shove

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
May 1, 2013
CASE NO. C11-1711RAJ (W.D. Wash. May. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Blatt v. Shove

Case Details

Full title:LEON S. BLATT, Plaintiff, v. PETE SHOVE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Date published: May 1, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. C11-1711RAJ (W.D. Wash. May. 1, 2013)