From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blasingame v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 14, 2023
No. 3658-22 (U.S.T.C. Mar. 14, 2023)

Opinion

3658-22

03-14-2023

ADAM M. BLASINGAME & KENDRA M. TODD, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Maurice B. Foley Judge

On January 31, 2022, the petition to commence this case was received and filed by the Court. Petitioners seek review of a notice of deficiency, dated October 25, 2021, issued for petitioners' 2019 tax year.

This Court is a court of limited jurisdiction. Relevant to this case, our jurisdiction in a deficiency case depends on the issuance of a notice of deficiency and the timely filing of a petition within 90 days of the issuance of the notice. See Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) sec. 6213. If a petition is timely mailed, as indicated by the postmark on the envelope containing the petition, it is treated as being timely filed. I.R.C. sec. 7502(a).

The notice of deficiency upon which this case is based indicates that the last day to file a petition with the Tax Court was January 24, 2022. The envelope containing the petition does not appear to bear a postmark. Accordingly, the petition may not have been timely filed and, if so, this Court is without jurisdiction in this case.

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that, on or before March 27, 2023, the parties shall show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the petition was not filed within the time prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code.


Summaries of

Blasingame v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 14, 2023
No. 3658-22 (U.S.T.C. Mar. 14, 2023)
Case details for

Blasingame v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:ADAM M. BLASINGAME & KENDRA M. TODD, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Mar 14, 2023

Citations

No. 3658-22 (U.S.T.C. Mar. 14, 2023)