From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blanton v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Mar 21, 2016
No. 3:15-cv-00353-AC (D. Or. Mar. 21, 2016)

Opinion

No. 3:15-cv-00353-AC

03-21-2016

CHRISTIAN C. BLANTON AND VELDONNA L. BLANTON, husband and wife, Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION; WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC.; AND NORTHWEST TRUSTEE SERVICES, INC., Corporations, Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER MOSMAN, J.,

On February 29, 2016, Magistrate Judge Acosta issued his Findings and Recommendation (F&R) [30], recommending that Defendant Northwest Trustee's Motion to Dismiss [17] should be GRANTED and the Plaintiffs' Compliant should be DISMISSED with prejudice. No objections to the Findings and Recommendation were filed.

DISCUSSION

The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Upon review, I agree with Judge Acosta's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [30] as my own opinion. As I agree with Judge Acosta's decision and GRANT Northwest Trustee Services's Motion to Dismiss [17], Federal Home Loan Mortgage and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage's Motion for Summary Judgment [14] is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 21st day of March, 2016.

/s/ Michael W. Mosman

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Blanton v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Mar 21, 2016
No. 3:15-cv-00353-AC (D. Or. Mar. 21, 2016)
Case details for

Blanton v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTIAN C. BLANTON AND VELDONNA L. BLANTON, husband and wife…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Mar 21, 2016

Citations

No. 3:15-cv-00353-AC (D. Or. Mar. 21, 2016)

Citing Cases

Reutov v. Am. Home Mortg. Acceptance

Accordingly, whoever possesses a note endorsed in blank holds the beneficial interest therein and may…

Naumov v. Sheloint Mortg. Servicing

Accordingly, whoever possesses a note endorsed in blank holds the beneficial interest therein and may non…