Opinion
February 9, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Velsor, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Based upon the record before us, we conclude that the appellants failed to demonstrate that "unusual or unanticipated circumstances" developed subsequent to the filing of the note of issue and certificate of readiness, thereby warranting additional pretrial proceedings (see, Chaloupka v. Neil's Plumbing Heating, 114 A.D.2d 833, 834; Di Maria v. Coordinated Ranches, 114 A.D.2d 397; Ehrhart v. County of Nassau, 106 A.D.2d 488; 22 NYCRR former 675.7, 103.4; now 22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]). Accordingly, Special Term properly denied the appellants' motion. Thompson, J.P., Niehoff, Weinstein, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.