From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blankenship v. Birch

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit
May 13, 2015
785 F.3d 1174 (7th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 13–3296.

2015-05-13

Lee BLANKENSHIP, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Kimberly BIRCH, Defendant–Appellee.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. No. 10–542–GPM, G. Patrick Murphy, Judge.
Before RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge, MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge, ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Petition for Rehearing filed by Plaintiff–Appellant on March 5, 2015, this court's order of November 5, 2014 is amended as follows. In all other respects, all members of the original panel have voted to deny the petition for rehearing. No active judge called for a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. Accordingly, in all other respects, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

1) In the third paragraph: Delete the words “Two months” in the fourth sentence final sentence, delete the phrase “he reported no pain, and” and begin the sentence with “Dr. Birch.”

2) In the penultimate paragraph delete the two sentences beginning with the phrase “to the contrary, his medical records are devoid of any complaints about elbow pain” and ending with the phrase “surgery is not a cure.”


Summaries of

Blankenship v. Birch

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit
May 13, 2015
785 F.3d 1174 (7th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Blankenship v. Birch

Case Details

Full title:LEE BLANKENSHIP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KIMBERLY BIRCH…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Date published: May 13, 2015

Citations

785 F.3d 1174 (7th Cir. 2015)