From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bland v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 13, 2021
1:20-cv-00478-DAD-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00478-DAD-EPG (PC)

09-13-2021

JOSHUA BLAND, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' FIRST MOTION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER

(ECF NO. 68)

On September 10, 2021, Defendants filed their first motion to modify the scheduling order. (ECF No. 68). “The grounds for this motion are that Plaintiff has completely failed to comply with orders to provide initial disclosures, and has more recently completely failed to comply with the Court's order to exchange documents demonstrating his efforts to exhaust administrative remedies. Defendants have nonetheless diligently defended this case, served written discovery Bland, and are awaiting Bland's responses. Defendants believe that there is a viable exhaustion-related defense. But, additional time is necessary to complete discovery before filing an exhaustion motion, or any further dispositive motion.” (Id. at 2).

The Court finds good cause to grant Defendant's motion. The scheduling order is modified as follows:

Event

Deadline/Date

Exhaustion Motions

December 9, 2021

Motions to Compel

January 13, 2022

Report re: Settlement Conference

March 3, 2022

Non-expert Discovery

April 14, 2022

Dispositive motions

May 19, 2022

All other terms and conditions of the Scheduling Order remain in full force and effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bland v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 13, 2021
1:20-cv-00478-DAD-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Bland v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA BLAND, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 13, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-00478-DAD-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2021)