From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bland v. Moffett

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 27, 2021
1:19-cv-01750-NONE-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2021)

Opinion

1:19-cv-01750-NONE-SKO (PC)

08-27-2021

JOSHUA DAVIS BLAND, Plaintiff, v. D. MOFFETT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY AND TO MODIFY DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER (DOC. 42)

Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendants have filed a motion to stay merits-based discovery, and to vacate the discovery and dispositive-motion deadlines, until after the Court rules on Defendants' pending exhaustion-based motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 42.) The time for Plaintiff to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants' motion to vacate these deadlines and to stay discovery has not yet passed, see Local Rule 230(1); however, the Court finds neither necessary here because it finds good cause to grant Defendants' requests.

Accordingly, Defendant's motion (Doc. 42) is GRANTED. The Court STAYS discovery in this matter, except for discovery pertaining to exhaustion of administrative remedies, until the Court rules on Defendants' exhaustion-based motion for summary judgment (Doc. 41).

The Court additionally VACATES the discovery and dispositive-motion deadlines and the deadline to amend the pleadings, to be reset if and when appropriate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bland v. Moffett

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 27, 2021
1:19-cv-01750-NONE-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Bland v. Moffett

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA DAVIS BLAND, Plaintiff, v. D. MOFFETT, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 27, 2021

Citations

1:19-cv-01750-NONE-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2021)