From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bland v. Gellman, Brydges & Schroff

Court of Appeals of New York.
Dec 14, 2017
91 N.E.3d 1212 (N.Y. 2017)

Opinion

2017–896

12-14-2017

In the Matter of Sharon K. BLAND, Appellant, v. GELLMAN, BRYDGES & SCHROFF et al., Respondents. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent. In the Matter of Sharon K. Bland, Appellant, v. Ronco Communications et al., Respondents. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.


Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from those portions of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the February 2, 2015 and February 25, 2015 Workers' Compensation Board decisions, and that part of the January 20, 2015 Workers' Compensation Board amended decision denying the application for reconsideration and/or full Board review, dismissed upon the ground that such portions of the order do not finally determine the proceedings within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that dismissed the appeal from the January 27, 2015 Workers' Compensation Board amended decision, dismissed upon the ground that as to that portion of the order, appellant is not a party aggrieved; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Judge Stein took no part.


Summaries of

Bland v. Gellman, Brydges & Schroff

Court of Appeals of New York.
Dec 14, 2017
91 N.E.3d 1212 (N.Y. 2017)
Case details for

Bland v. Gellman, Brydges & Schroff

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Sharon K. BLAND, Appellant, v. GELLMAN, BRYDGES & SCHROFF…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Dec 14, 2017

Citations

91 N.E.3d 1212 (N.Y. 2017)
30 N.Y.3d 1035
69 N.Y.S.3d 233
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 95489