From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blanco v. Kernan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 3, 2017
Case No. CV 17-1448-MWF (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. CV 17-1448-MWF (GJS)

10-03-2017

ISIDRO BLANCO, Petitioner v. SCOTT KERNAN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition ("Petition"), Respondent's Motion to Dismiss the Petition [Dkt. 8, "Motion"], all pleadings and other documents filed in this action, and the Amended Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 19, "Report"). The time for filing Objections to the Report has passed, and no Objections have been filed with the Court.

Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Motion is GRANTED; (2) the unexhausted claims alleged in the Petition - Ground One, Ground Two, Subclaim One of Ground Three, and Ground Four - are dismissed without prejudice; (3) the Petition is deemed to be amended to consist solely of Subclaim Two of Ground Three; and (4) Respondent shall file and serve an Answer to the Petition, as so amended, and lodge the remaining pertinent portions of the state record within sixty (60) days of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: October 3, 2017

/s/_________

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Blanco v. Kernan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 3, 2017
Case No. CV 17-1448-MWF (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2017)
Case details for

Blanco v. Kernan

Case Details

Full title:ISIDRO BLANCO, Petitioner v. SCOTT KERNAN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 3, 2017

Citations

Case No. CV 17-1448-MWF (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2017)