From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blanco v. Joseph

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Sep 28, 2021
3:21cv904-LC-HTC (N.D. Fla. Sep. 28, 2021)

Opinion

3:21cv904-LC-HTC

09-28-2021

ALANO BLANCO, Petitioner, v. M V JOSEPH WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER

LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated August 26, 2021 (ECF No. 5). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No. objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that it should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. 5) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

1

2. The petition, ECF Doc. 1 is DISMISSED under Habeas Rule 4.

3. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Blanco v. Joseph

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Sep 28, 2021
3:21cv904-LC-HTC (N.D. Fla. Sep. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Blanco v. Joseph

Case Details

Full title:ALANO BLANCO, Petitioner, v. M V JOSEPH WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Florida

Date published: Sep 28, 2021

Citations

3:21cv904-LC-HTC (N.D. Fla. Sep. 28, 2021)

Citing Cases

Rolo v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution-MIAMI

See 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d). Congress gave the BOP two years to “phase in” the program's implementation. See…

Greene v. Strong

Id. at *3 (collecting cases); see Stucker v. Strong, No. 4:21-cv-11-MW-MJF, Order Accepting and Adopting…