From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blanchard v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Oct 12, 1970
433 F.2d 13 (5th Cir. 1970)

Opinion

No. 30111 Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

October 12, 1970.

Anthony J. Blanchard, pro se.

John W. Stokes, Jr., U.S. Atty., Allen I. Hirsch, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before WISDOM, COLEMAN, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.



This appeal is taken from an order of the District Court denying the petition of a federal convict for the writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.

Appellant is presently serving a ten year sentence for violations of federal narcotics laws. On September 5, 1968, he was released under the mandatory release provisions of Title 18 U.S.C. § 4163 with 1,422 days remaining to be served. On January 2, 1970, appellant was arrested on a mandatory release violator's warrant and returned to confinement.

In his habeas petition appellant contends that his release under § 4163 is irrevocable since he had in essence completed his sentence as of the date he was released from prison. He further challenges the revocation of his good time earned prior to his release.

It is well settled that under 18 U.S.C. § 4164 a convict who is granted conditional release pursuant to § 4163 is considered as if released on parole. Garnett v. Blackwell, 5 Cir., 1970, 423 F.2d 1211; Buchanan v. Blackwell, 5 Cir., 1967, 372 F.2d 451; Frierson v. Rogers, 5 Cir., 1961, 289 F.2d 234. Where the conditions of parole are violated, he may be required to serve the remainder of his sentence and the time spent on parole shall not diminish the sentence. 18 U.S.C. § 4105; Garnett v. Blackwell, supra; Lynch v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 414 F.2d 281; Clark v. Blackwell, 5 Cir., 1967, 374 F.2d 952, 953. Further, all or any part of his earned good time may be revoked. Smith v. Attorney General, 5 Cir., 1969, 420 F.2d 488; Lynch v. United States, supra; Smith v. Blackwell, 5 Cir., 1966, 367 F.2d 539; Frierson v. Rogers, supra.

There being no merit to appellant's contentions, the judgment of the District Court is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Blanchard v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Oct 12, 1970
433 F.2d 13 (5th Cir. 1970)
Case details for

Blanchard v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Anthony J. BLANCHARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Oct 12, 1970

Citations

433 F.2d 13 (5th Cir. 1970)

Citing Cases

Woods v. United States

It is well settled that Woods is not entitled to credit on his sentence for time spent on mandatory release.…

Quarls v. State of Missouri

The forfeiture of previously earned "good time" credits following the revocation of a convicted person's…