From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blalock v. Kelso

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 29, 2022
2:17-cv-1813 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2022)

Opinion

2:17-cv-1813 TLN AC P

06-29-2022

CHARLES BLALOCK, Plaintiff, v. J. CLARK KELSO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The parties in this case have filed a stipulated substitution of parties seeking to substitute the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation for defendant Miranda. ECF No. 70. The request to substitute parties will be granted. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and plaintiff have also stipulated to dismissal of this case with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), and the stipulated dismissal will be honored.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The stipulated request to substitute the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation for defendant Miranda (ECF No. 70) is GRANTED and the Clerk of the Court is directed to update the docket accordingly.

2. This action is dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the parties' stipulated dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii). See ECF No. 70.


Summaries of

Blalock v. Kelso

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 29, 2022
2:17-cv-1813 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Blalock v. Kelso

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES BLALOCK, Plaintiff, v. J. CLARK KELSO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 29, 2022

Citations

2:17-cv-1813 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2022)