From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blakley v. Dilman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 27, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7671 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 27, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7671

12-27-2012

KENNETH BLAKLEY, Petitioner, v. JEFFREY DILMAN et al., Respondents.


ORDER

And AND NOW, this 27th dayof ___, 2012, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Response and Reply thereto, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Arnold C. Rapoport, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. the Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and without an evidentiary hearing; and
3. there is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

Robert Kelly, J.


Summaries of

Blakley v. Dilman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 27, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7671 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Blakley v. Dilman

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH BLAKLEY, Petitioner, v. JEFFREY DILMAN et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 27, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7671 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 27, 2012)