From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blakey v. Herring

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Oct 6, 2017
Civil Action No. 3:17CV468 (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:17CV468

10-06-2017

WILLIAM THORNTON BLAKEY, Plaintiff, v. MARK HERRING, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

By Memorandum Order entered on August 2, 2017, the Court conditionally docketed the action. At that time, the Court directed William Thornton Blakey to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to the collection of fees form. The Court warned Blakey that a failure to comply with the above directive within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action.

Blakey has not complied with the order of this Court. Blakey failed to return the consent to collection of fees form. As a result, he does not qualify for in forma pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Such conduct demonstrates a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, this action will be dismissed without prejudice.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of the Memorandum Opinion to Blakey.

/s/_________

Robert E. Payne

Senior United States District Judge Date: October 6, 2017
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Blakey v. Herring

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Oct 6, 2017
Civil Action No. 3:17CV468 (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2017)
Case details for

Blakey v. Herring

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM THORNTON BLAKEY, Plaintiff, v. MARK HERRING, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Oct 6, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:17CV468 (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2017)