From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blakesley v. Fisher

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 19, 2020
No. 2:20-cv-0567 AC P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2020)

Opinion

No. 2:20-cv-0567 AC P

03-19-2020

MARK DANIEL BLAKESLEY, Petitioner, v. RAYTHEL FISHER, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district. DATED: March 19, 2020

/s/_________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Blakesley v. Fisher

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 19, 2020
No. 2:20-cv-0567 AC P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2020)
Case details for

Blakesley v. Fisher

Case Details

Full title:MARK DANIEL BLAKESLEY, Petitioner, v. RAYTHEL FISHER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 19, 2020

Citations

No. 2:20-cv-0567 AC P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2020)