From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blakely v. Tatarsky

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 29, 2010
385 F. App'x 343 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-7832.

Submitted: June 24, 2010.

Decided: June 29, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (4:08-cv-03609-MBS).

James G. Blakely, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Barry Johnson, Lee Erter Wilson Holler Smith, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


James G. Blakely appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blakely v. Tatarsky, No. 4:08-cv-03609-MBS, 2009 WL 2922987 (D.S.C. filed Sept. 1, 2009) (entered Sept. 2, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Blakely v. Tatarsky

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 29, 2010
385 F. App'x 343 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Blakely v. Tatarsky

Case Details

Full title:James G. BLAKELY, a/k/a Jimmy G. Blakely, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David M…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 29, 2010

Citations

385 F. App'x 343 (4th Cir. 2010)