From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blakely v. Handyman Online, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Jun 28, 2000
No. 00 C 2406 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 28, 2000)

Opinion

No. 00 C 2406

June 28, 2000


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Handyman Online, Inc. ("Handyman") has filed its Answer to the Title VII employment discrimination action brought against it by its ex-employee Jacqueline Blakely (the gravamen of Blakely's Complaint sounds in sexual harassment leading to her claimed constructive discharge). Although Handyman's direct response to the Complaint's allegations is unexceptionable from a pleading perspective, this sua sponte memorandum order is triggered by certain of Handyman's claimed Affirmative Defenses ("ADs"), as to which Handyman's experienced counsel should clearly know better.

First, AD 1 sets out the equivalent of a Fed.R.Civ.P. ("Rule") 12 (b)(6) motion that Blakely "has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted." That is truly nonsensical when, as is required for such purposes, Blakely's allegations must be viewed as gospel. Based on those allegations, she is clearly entitled to stay in court under the basic teaching of Hishon v. King Spalding, 467 U.S. 69, 73 (1984).


Summaries of

Blakely v. Handyman Online, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Jun 28, 2000
No. 00 C 2406 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 28, 2000)
Case details for

Blakely v. Handyman Online, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JACQUELINE BLAKELY, Plaintiff, v. HANDYMAN ONLINE, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division

Date published: Jun 28, 2000

Citations

No. 00 C 2406 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 28, 2000)