From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blake v. The City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 2, 2022
21-CV-188 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 2, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-188 (RA)

12-02-2022

CHARLES BLAKE, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, and POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE #1 - 6, said names being fictitious and representing the unknown and intended to be named later New York City Police Department Officers and Captain involved in the occurrence herein, individually and in their respective capacities as members of the New York City Police Department, Defendants.


ORDER

RONNIE ABRAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Charles Blake's unopposed motion to compel nonparty Cohen's Fashion Optical (“Cohen's”) to comply with its subpoena. Cohen's shall respond to Plaintiff's motion, or otherwise respond to the subpoena, by no later than two weeks after Plaintiff effects service of this Order. If Cohen's fails to do so, Plaintiff's motion to compel will be granted.

Plaintiff shall personally serve this Order on Cohen's and promptly file proof of service on the docket.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Blake v. The City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 2, 2022
21-CV-188 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Blake v. The City of New York

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES BLAKE, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 2, 2022

Citations

21-CV-188 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 2, 2022)