Summary
In Blake v. State, Case No. 1D14–3888, 2016 WL 1359350 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016), we per curiam affirmed appellant's conviction for the new law violation; therefore, we affirm the revocation of probation on Condition 5. However, we write to address appellant's second issue on appeal in which he argues that the written Order of Revocation of Probation does not conform to the oral pronouncement.
Summary of this case from Blake v. StateOpinion
No. 1D14–3888.
04-06-2016
Robert Ira BLAKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Jennifer S. Morrisey, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General; Trisha Meggs Pate, Giselle D. Lylen, and Jillian Hope Reding, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Jennifer S. Morrisey, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General; Trisha Meggs Pate, Giselle D. Lylen, and Jillian Hope Reding, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
ROBERTS, C.J., MAKAR and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.