From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blake v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 16, 1979
244 Ga. 466 (Ga. 1979)

Opinion

35146.

SUBMITTED OCTOBER 9, 1979.

DECIDED OCTOBER 16, 1979.

Murder; extraordinary motion for new trial. Chatham Superior Court. Before Judge Cheatham.

Reginald C. Haupt, Jr., for appellant.

Andrew J. Ryan, III, District Attorney, Robert M. Hitch, III, Assistant District Attorney, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, for appellee.


Joseph James Blake was indicted, convicted and sentenced to death for the November 15, 1975, murder of two-year-old Tiffany Loury by throwing her off a bridge. His direct appeal resulted in affirmance of his conviction and sentence. Blake v. State, 239 Ga. 292 ( 236 S.E.2d 637) (1977). He appeals from the denial of his extraordinary motion for new trial, enumerating as error the absence from the transcript of proceedings of the prosecutor's closing arguments to the jury during the punishment phase of the trial.

The absence of a transcript of the prosecutor's closing arguments was a matter known to defense counsel at the time of Blake's direct appeal. All alleged errors premised upon the absence of that transcript should have been enumerated in that appeal and cannot now be raised by extraordinary motion for new trial. Goodwin v. State, 240 Ga. 605 ( 242 S.E.2d 119) (1978). The trial court has not committed error.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.


SUBMITTED OCTOBER 9, 1979 — DECIDED OCTOBER 16, 1979.


Summaries of

Blake v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 16, 1979
244 Ga. 466 (Ga. 1979)
Case details for

Blake v. State

Case Details

Full title:BLAKE v. THE STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Oct 16, 1979

Citations

244 Ga. 466 (Ga. 1979)
260 S.E.2d 876

Citing Cases

Grant v. State

We have found no valid ground asserted in the motion which would justify it to be considered as an…

Gaddis v. State

Defendant's motion was properly denied because those enumerations are not proper subjects for consideration…