From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blake v. Metz

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Apr 23, 1929
276 P. 765 (Okla. 1929)

Opinion

No. 19017

Opinion Filed April 23, 1929.

Commissioners' Opinion, Division No. 2.

Error from District Court, Creek County; Fred A. Speakman, Judge.

Action by W. H. Metz against Ralph A. Blake, County Treasurer, and Fred L. Patrick, County Assessor of Creek County. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Reversed and remanded, with direction.

W. F. Pardoe, Co. Atty., for plaintiffs in error.

Davis Frazier, for defendant in error.


The identical questions involved in Blake, County Treasurer, and Fred L. Patrick, County Assessor, v. W. H. Metz, 136 Okla. 146, 276 P. 762, are involved in this appeal. The pleadings are almost alike, the only difference being that a different tract of land is here involved, and in the petition and amended petition herein, the discrepancy in the description of the land does not appear. The record is in other respects identical, except that in this case it does not appear that the assistant county attorney approved the journal entry of the judgment.

From what is held in that case, it necessarily follows that the order denying the motion to vacate the judgment should be reversed, and the cause remanded, with direction to set aside and vacate the judgment rendered in this case.

The syllabus in Blake, County Treasurer, et al. v. Metz, supra, is adopted as the syllabus to this case.

BENNETT, HERR, HALL, and JEFFREY, Commissioners, concur.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Blake v. Metz

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Apr 23, 1929
276 P. 765 (Okla. 1929)
Case details for

Blake v. Metz

Case Details

Full title:BLAKE, Co. Treas., et al. v. METZ

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Apr 23, 1929

Citations

276 P. 765 (Okla. 1929)
136 Okla. 150

Citing Cases

Settle v. Frakes

The prayer for an injunction against a tax resale was denied by this court in Wallace, Co. Treas., v.…