From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blake v. Janes

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Aug 2, 2022
No. 1D21-1897 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 2, 2022)

Opinion

1D21-1897

08-02-2022

Tanya M. Blake and James C. Blake, Appellants, v. Christopher P. Janes and Michles & Booth, P.A., Appellees.

Tanya M. Blake and James C. Blake, pro se, Appellants. Gregory K. Rettig of Lloyd, Gray, Whitehead & Monroe, P.C., Pensacola, for Appellees.


Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

Tanya M. Blake and James C. Blake, pro se, Appellants.

Gregory K. Rettig of Lloyd, Gray, Whitehead & Monroe, P.C., Pensacola, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.

Makar, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Blake v. Janes

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Aug 2, 2022
No. 1D21-1897 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Blake v. Janes

Case Details

Full title:Tanya M. Blake and James C. Blake, Appellants, v. Christopher P. Janes and…

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Aug 2, 2022

Citations

No. 1D21-1897 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 2, 2022)