Opinion
Argued March 16, 1899
Decided March 24, 1899
Jonathan C. Ross and Philip Carpenter for appellant.
Samuel Untermyer and Moses Weinman for respondent.
We think the judgment should be affirmed, with costs. There was no valid renewal of the note in question on the 28th day of October, 1887. ( Olmstead v. Latimer, 158 N.Y. 313, and authorities there cited.)
Upon the other questions involved we call attention to the cases of Chapman v. Lynch ( 156 N.Y. 551) and Close v. Potter ( 155 N.Y. 145, 156).
All concur.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.