From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blais v. Deyo

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 27, 1983
60 N.Y.2d 679 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Decided September 27, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, CARROL S. WALSH, JR., J.

Lois McS. Webb for appellants.

John L. Bell for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

In granting the motion to dismiss on the ground of forum non conveniens, the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion as a matter of law or in exercising that discretion fail to take into account all of the various factors entitled to consideration ( Irrigation Ind. Dev. Corp. v Indag, S.A., 37 N.Y.2d 522, 525).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Blais v. Deyo

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 27, 1983
60 N.Y.2d 679 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Blais v. Deyo

Case Details

Full title:MADELINE BLAIS et al., Appellants, v. ALDEN DEYO, JR., Respondent, et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 27, 1983

Citations

60 N.Y.2d 679 (N.Y. 1983)
468 N.Y.S.2d 103
455 N.E.2d 662

Citing Cases

Ward v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (In re N.Y.C. Asbestos Litig.)

As such, on remand in Silver v. Great American Insurance Company, the Appellate Division First Department…

U.S. Aviation Underwriters v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co.

(Silver v Great Am. Ins. Co., 29 N.Y.2d 356, 361.) It is a flexible doctrine and whether the facts and…