From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BLAIR v. ING

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Mar 9, 2001
22401 (Haw. Mar. 9, 2001)

Opinion

22401.

March 9, 2001.

Appeal from the Second Circuit Court (Civ. No. 98-0757(2)).


ORDER SUSPENDING HRAP RULE 40(d) AND REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS TO FILE ANSWER TO APPELLEE LAWRENCE N.C. ING'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Upon consideration of appellee Lawrence N.C. Ing's motion for reconsideration, filed on March 7, 2001, and the record herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to HRAP 2, the time requirement of HRAP 40(d) is hereby suspended, and the time in which the court shall dispose of the aforementioned motion is hereby extended through April 30, 2001; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to HRAP 40(b), plaintiffs-appellants shall file an answer to the aforementioned motion for reconsideration no later than March 23, 2001.


Summaries of

BLAIR v. ING

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Mar 9, 2001
22401 (Haw. Mar. 9, 2001)
Case details for

BLAIR v. ING

Case Details

Full title:Leslie BLAIR and Laurie Bishop, Co-Trustees of the 1988 Hughes Family…

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: Mar 9, 2001

Citations

22401 (Haw. Mar. 9, 2001)