From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blair v. Herrera-Salazar

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Apr 7, 2022
19cv1261 DMS (KSC) (S.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2022)

Opinion

19cv1261 DMS (KSC)

04-07-2022

JERMAINE ROBERT BLAIR, CDCR #F-81619 Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HERRERA-SALAZAR, et. al., Defendant.


ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

HON. DANA M. SABRAW UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Herrera-Salazar's (“Defendant”) motion for judgment on the pleadings per Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). (ECF No. 25). Plaintiff Jermaine Robert Blair (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 29). Defendant thereafter filed a reply. (ECF No. 30). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Civil Local Rule 72.3, the motion was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for a Report and Recommendation (“Report”). On September 21, 2020, Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford issued her Report, recommending that the Court grant Defendant's motion. (ECF No. 33). Plaintiff filed an objection to the Report. (ECF No. 34). Defendant did not file a reply.

This Court, having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judge's Report, and Plaintiff's objections thereto, adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation in full. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is granted, and Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice and without further leave to amend.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Blair v. Herrera-Salazar

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Apr 7, 2022
19cv1261 DMS (KSC) (S.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Blair v. Herrera-Salazar

Case Details

Full title:JERMAINE ROBERT BLAIR, CDCR #F-81619 Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Apr 7, 2022

Citations

19cv1261 DMS (KSC) (S.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2022)