From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blackwell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Mar 31, 1998
964 S.W.2d 249 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 72420

FILED: March 31, 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Philip J. Sweeney, Judge.

Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. Nixon, Jill C. LaHue, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.



ORDER

Movant appeals from the judgment entered denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and find the motion court's judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Blackwell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Mar 31, 1998
964 S.W.2d 249 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Blackwell v. State

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST BLACKWELL, Appellant, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE

Date published: Mar 31, 1998

Citations

964 S.W.2d 249 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Jeffcoat v. State

"The fixedness or strength of an existing opinion is the essential test of a juror's competency, when his…