From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blackwell v. Robinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 13, 2013
Case No. 12-cv-04329-JST (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 12-cv-04329-JST

03-13-2013

STEVEN DIEZ BLACKWELL, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN ROBINSON, et al., Defendants.


NOTICE REGARDING ORAL

ARGUMENT


Re: Dkt. Nos. 26

Having reviewed the written submissions with respect to Bank of the West's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, Dkt. No. 26, the Court is of the view that oral argument is unnecessary and hereby vacates the hearing set for March 21, 2013. If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by noon on March 15, 2013 that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient to all parties in order to provide that opportunity.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

Jon S. Tigar

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Blackwell v. Robinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 13, 2013
Case No. 12-cv-04329-JST (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Blackwell v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN DIEZ BLACKWELL, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN ROBINSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 13, 2013

Citations

Case No. 12-cv-04329-JST (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)