From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blackwell v. Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1923
120 S.E. 925 (N.C. 1923)

Opinion

(Filed 5 December, 1923.)

APPEAL by defendant from Shaw, J., at August Term, 1923, of GUILFORD.

S. B. Adams, R. C. Strudwick, and Geo. A. Younce for plaintiff.

King, Sapp King for defendant.


Civil action tried upon the following issues:

"1. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: `Yes.'

"2. Did the plaintiff, by his own negligence, contribute to his own injury, as alleged in the answer? Answer: `No.'

"3. What damage, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant? Answer: `$448.'"

Judgment on the verdict in favor of plaintiff. Defendant appealed.


Let the verdict and judgment in this case be upheld, as the record presents no reversible error. Cook v. Mfg. Co., 182 N.C. 205.

No error.


Summaries of

Blackwell v. Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1923
120 S.E. 925 (N.C. 1923)
Case details for

Blackwell v. Mfg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN BLACKWELL v. PROXIMITY MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 1923

Citations

120 S.E. 925 (N.C. 1923)
120 S.E. 925