Opinion
2:19-cv-00442-TLN-DB
09-20-2021
RODNEY KARL BLACKWELL, Plaintiff, v. A. JENKINS, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
TROY L. NUNLEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff Rodney Karl Blackwell (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 27, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (ECF No. 59.) Plaintiff has not filed timely objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed July 27, 2021 (ECF No. 59), are ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. Plaintiffs Motion for Keep Away Order (ECF No. 46) is DENIED; and
3. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.