From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blackwell v. Green

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Sep 17, 2012
Civil Action No. 12 1533 (D.D.C. Sep. 17, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12 1533

09-17-2012

Taneika Blackwell, Plaintiff, v. Ericka Green, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant plaintiff's application and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction is available only when a "federal question" is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least plead facts that bring the suit within the court's jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to plead such facts warrants dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).

Plaintiff is a resident of Temple Hills, Maryland, suing a resident there for unpaid parking tickets in the amount of $1,065. Compl. at 1 -2. The complaint neither presents a federal question nor provides a basis for diversity jurisdiction. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

______________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Blackwell v. Green

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Sep 17, 2012
Civil Action No. 12 1533 (D.D.C. Sep. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Blackwell v. Green

Case Details

Full title:Taneika Blackwell, Plaintiff, v. Ericka Green, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Sep 17, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12 1533 (D.D.C. Sep. 17, 2012)