From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blackwell v. Glebe

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Oct 18, 2011
Case No. C11-5207BHS (W.D. Wash. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. C11-5207BHS.

October 18, 2011


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R R") of the Honorable Karen L. Strombom, United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 17) and Petitioner Larry Blackwell's ("Blackwell") objections to the R R (Dkt. 18).

On March 17, 2011, Blackwell filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging his state court conviction. Dkt. 1. Blackwell asserted two grounds for relief: (1) the trial court's denial of the motion to sever trials violated Blackwell's right to remain silent and not testify and (2) the prosecutor committed misconduct by referring to Blackwell as a drug dealer. Id.

On September 12, 2011, Judge Strombom issued the R R recommending that the Court deny the petition. Dkt. 17. On September 28, 2011, Blackwell filed objections. Dkt. 18. On October 3, 2011, the Government filed a response to the objections. Dkt. 19.

Upon objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the district court reviews the objected-to portions of the report and recommendation de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In this case, Blackwell fails to allege any specific error in the R R and his objections are essentially a reiteration of the grounds for relief in his petition (Dkt. 1) and supporting memorandum (Dkt. 2). Regardless, the Court has reviewed the record and the applicable case law and finds no error in the R R. Blackwell has failed to meet his burden under 28 U.S.C. 2254(d) on both grounds for relief and on his cumulative error argument that was presented throughout his pleadings. Blackwell has also failed to meet his burden for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

Therefore, the Court having considered the R R, Blackwell's objections, and the remaining record, does hereby find and order as follows:

(1) The R R (Dkt. 17) is ADOPTED;

(2) The petition (Dkt. 1) is DENIED;

(3) A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED; and

(4) This action is DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Blackwell v. Glebe

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Oct 18, 2011
Case No. C11-5207BHS (W.D. Wash. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Blackwell v. Glebe

Case Details

Full title:LARRY D. BLACKWELL, Petitioner, v. PATRICK GLEBE, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

Case No. C11-5207BHS (W.D. Wash. Oct. 18, 2011)