From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blackwell v. Covello

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 24, 2021
2:20-cv-1755 DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-1755 DB P

09-24-2021

RODNEY KARL BLACKWELL, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK COVELLO, Warden, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants have failed to provide a safe prison environment in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. Presently before the court is defendant's motion for an extension of time to opt out of the post-screening ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) project. (ECF No. 23.) A settlement conference has been set for November 22, 2021. (ECF No. 22.)

Counsel for defendant scheduled a telephone call with plaintiff to determine whether or not the early settlement conference would be a waste of resources. (ECF No. 23 at 3.) Counsel states additional time is necessary as plaintiff was unable to attend the scheduled phone conference because his housing unit was under a COVID-19 quarantine. (Id.) Good Cause appearing the court will grant the motion.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 23) is granted; and

2. Any motion to opt out shall be filed on or before October 11, 2021.


Summaries of

Blackwell v. Covello

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 24, 2021
2:20-cv-1755 DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Blackwell v. Covello

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY KARL BLACKWELL, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK COVELLO, Warden, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 24, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-1755 DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2021)