From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blackstone v. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 7, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-899 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 7, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-899

11-07-2013

STEPHEN BLACKSTONE, Plaintiff, v. A. L. THOMPSON, Defendant.


Judge Cathy Bissoon

Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.C, 72.D and 72.G of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

On October 4, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 72) recommending that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 53) be granted. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on the parties, and Defendant timely filed objections. See Doc. 74.

After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the Objections thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 53) is GRANTED. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Eddy dated October 4, 2013 is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

Cathy Bissoon

United States District Judge
cc (via ECF email notification): All Counsel of Record cc (via First-Class U.S. Mail): Stephen Bernard Blackstone
GE-5445
S.C.I. Greene
175 Progress Drive
Waynesburg, PA 15370


Summaries of

Blackstone v. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 7, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-899 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Blackstone v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN BLACKSTONE, Plaintiff, v. A. L. THOMPSON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 7, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-899 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 7, 2013)