From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blackstone Realty Investors, LLC v. Stewart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RENO, NEVADA
Aug 29, 2011
3:09-cv-0 0189-ECR-RAM (D. Nev. Aug. 29, 2011)

Opinion

3:09-cv-0 0189-ECR-RAM

08-29-2011

BLACKSTONE REALTY INVESTORS, LLC., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL B. STEWART, individually and as Trustee of the Michael B. Stewart Living Trust; HIGH ROCK HOLDING, LLC, ORIENT FARMS, LLC; H20, INC.; WHITE PAPER, LLC; EMPIRE FARMS, LLC; GRANITE INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC; TAHOE ROSE, LLC; SIERRA ROSE, LLC; HONALO KAI, LLC; CLEARWATER PROPERTIES, LLC; and DOES 1 through 60, inclusive, Defendants.

Counsel for Plaintiff(s) NONE APPEARING Counsel for Defendant(s) NONE APPEARING


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: EDWARD C. REED , JR. U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Deputy Clerk: COLLEEN LARSEN Reporter: NONE APPEARING

Counsel for Plaintiff(s) NONE APPEARING

Counsel for Defendant(s) NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS

On March 8, 2011, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (#106). Defendants argued that this action must be dismissed because all Defendants are citizens of the State of Nevada, and Plaintiff Blackstone Realty Investors, LLC ("Blackstone Realty") is also a citizen of the state of Nevada.

Plaintiff Blackstone Realty is an entity formed in the State of Delaware. However, Tom Gonzales, the managing member of Blackstone Realty, is a citizen of Nevada. The Ninth Circuit has held that "an LLC is a citizen of every state in which its owner/members are citizens." Johnson v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, LP, 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006).

On March 23, 2011, Plaintiff Blackstone Realty filed its response (#111) to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (#106). In its response, (#111), Plaintiff conceded that Johnson is dispositive, and that Plaintiff find no authority to the contrary. Plaintiff concluded by stating that "Blackstone reserves its right to recommence the action in state district court under NRS 11.500."

IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (#106) is GRANTED. The remaining pending motions (## 80, 105, 110) are DENIED as moot.

The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By ________________________________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Blackstone Realty Investors, LLC v. Stewart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RENO, NEVADA
Aug 29, 2011
3:09-cv-0 0189-ECR-RAM (D. Nev. Aug. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Blackstone Realty Investors, LLC v. Stewart

Case Details

Full title:BLACKSTONE REALTY INVESTORS, LLC., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL B. STEWART…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RENO, NEVADA

Date published: Aug 29, 2011

Citations

3:09-cv-0 0189-ECR-RAM (D. Nev. Aug. 29, 2011)