From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blackstock v. Brandon

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Mar 29, 2011
1:09CV828 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 2011)

Opinion

1:09CV828.

March 29, 2011


ORDER


On October 5, 2010, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Docket Entries 18 and 19.) Petitioner filed objections to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. (Docket Entry 20.)

The Court has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation which is affirmed and adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry 5) is granted, that the Habeas Petition (Docket Entry 1) is denied, that this action is dismissed, and that, finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is denied.


Summaries of

Blackstock v. Brandon

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Mar 29, 2011
1:09CV828 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Blackstock v. Brandon

Case Details

Full title:ROGER BLACKSTOCK, Petitioner, v. JUDY BRANDON, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Mar 29, 2011

Citations

1:09CV828 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 2011)