From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blackman v. Voohg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 22, 2018
No. 2:17-cv-2000 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2:17-cv-2000 JAM CKD P

02-22-2018

TONY BLACKMAN, Plaintiff, v. M. VOOHG, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed January 8, 2018, plaintiff was ordered to pay the filing fee within thirty days or face dismissal of the case. ECF No. 8. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings //// //// //// and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: February 22, 2018

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13:blac2000.fifp.f&r


Summaries of

Blackman v. Voohg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 22, 2018
No. 2:17-cv-2000 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2018)
Case details for

Blackman v. Voohg

Case Details

Full title:TONY BLACKMAN, Plaintiff, v. M. VOOHG, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 22, 2018

Citations

No. 2:17-cv-2000 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2018)