From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blackman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 3, 1951
242 S.W.2d 441 (Tex. Crim. App. 1951)

Opinion

No. 25385.

October 3, 1951.

Appeal from the County Court, Crosby County, J. M. Rankin, J.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Burks McNeil, Lubbock, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.


Appellant was convicted for violation of the liquor law and assessed a fine of $250, from which he appeals.

It is stipulated in the record that the complaint, as well as the information, originally filed charged appellant's name as Willie Blackburn. The court permitted the county attorney to amend both the complaint and information by changing the name of the accused and making it charge Willie Blackman.

When this was done the complaint was vitiated. The instrument signed by the affiant, Roy E. Hillin, ceased to be a complaint. See Patillo v. State, 3 Tex. App. 442[ 3 Tex.Crim. 442]; Phariss v. State, 136 Tex.Crim. R., 126 S.W.2d 981; Hedspeth v. State, 143 Tex.Crim. R., 160 S.W.2d 928, and the authorities discussed therein.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is dismissed.


Summaries of

Blackman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 3, 1951
242 S.W.2d 441 (Tex. Crim. App. 1951)
Case details for

Blackman v. State

Case Details

Full title:BLACKMAN v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Oct 3, 1951

Citations

242 S.W.2d 441 (Tex. Crim. App. 1951)
156 Tex. Crim. 288

Citing Cases

Wynn v. State

The Court of Criminal Appeals held the act of changing the name of the defendant is a ministerial act.…

Wynn v. State

Id., 823 S.W.2d at 302. However, the Court of Appeals further stated "[w]e recognize the Court of Criminal…