From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blackman v. Pollard

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2021
2:21-cv-0164 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0164 JAM KJN P

06-01-2021

TONY BLACKMAN, Plaintiff, v. M. POLLARD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 27, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 27, 2021, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Blackman v. Pollard

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2021
2:21-cv-0164 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Blackman v. Pollard

Case Details

Full title:TONY BLACKMAN, Plaintiff, v. M. POLLARD, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 1, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0164 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)

Citing Cases

Blackman v. Newsome

This Court has denied Plaintiff's IFP status in numerous other cases. See, e.g., Blackman v. Pollard, No.…

Blackman v. Newsome

A review of court records reveals that plaintiff has “struck out” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See, e.g.,…