From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blackman v. Newsom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 17, 2023
2:22-cv-00936-KJM-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00936-KJM-EFB (PC)

01-17-2023

TONY BLACKMAN, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff Tony Blackman (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On October 27, 2022, the court denied plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis because plaintiff is a three-strikes litigant within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and granted plaintiff fourteen days within which to pay the $402 filing fee for this action. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff was warned that failure to pay the filing fee within fourteen days would result in the dismissal of this action. Id. Plaintiff has not paid the fee.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Blackman v. Newsom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 17, 2023
2:22-cv-00936-KJM-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Blackman v. Newsom

Case Details

Full title:TONY BLACKMAN, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 17, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-00936-KJM-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2023)