Opinion
No. 33249
Decided December 10, 1952.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Intoxicating liquor — Board of Liquor Control — Authority to establish minimum selling price of wine — Section 6064-3a, General Code — Delegation of power not unlawful, when — Standards and rules for guidance of delegatee — Necessity for — Where delegated power relates to public health, safety, morals or welfare — Fixing price of wine as a police regulation — Statutory construction — Meaning of words, "may" and "shall," — Price fixing — Investiture of legislative power — Section 1, Article II, Constitution.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin county.
Messrs. Cohen Baron, for appellant.
Mr. C. William O'Neill, attorney general, and Mr. Ralph N. Mahaffey, for appellee.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.