Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Blackford v. Boone Cnty. Area Plan Comm'n

43 N.E.3d 655 (Ind. App. 2015)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Blackford v. Boone Cnty. Area Plan Comm'n

15 Citing cases

  1. Lasater v. Rishor (In re Rishor)

    No. 21A-GU-2713 (Ind. App. Aug. 2, 2022)

    Blackford v. Boone Cnty. Area Plan Comm'n, 43 N.E.3d 655, 664 (Ind.Ct.App. 2015) (quotation omitted).

  2. A.C. v. Ind. Dep't of Child Servs. (In re M.S.)

    140 N.E.3d 279 (Ind. 2020)   Cited 53 times
    In Matter of M.S., 140 N.E.3d 279 (Ind. 2020), our Supreme Court addressed the statutory deadlines of Indiana Code Section 31-34-11-1.

    There are no "mechanical tests" for determining whether a request for a continuance was made for good cause. SeeBlackford v. Boone County Area Plan Com'n , 43 N.E.3d 655, 664 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015). Rather, the decision to grant or deny a continuance turns on the circumstances present in a particular case, id. , and the circumstances of this particular case justified the trial court's decision.

  3. Collins v. Collins

    No. 24A-DN-185 (Ind. App. Jul. 9, 2024)

    Blackford v. Boone Cnty. Area Plan Comm'n, 43 N.E.3d 655, 664 (Ind.Ct.App. 2015) (quotation omitted).

  4. I.D. v. Ind. Dep't of Child Servs.

    No. 23A-JT-1732 (Ind. App. Apr. 30, 2024)

    Motions for continuance made for the first time on the morning of trial are disfavored. Blackford v. Boone Cnty. Area Plan Comm'n, 43 N.E.3d 655, 664 (Ind.Ct.App. 2015).

  5. Barriger v. The Brown Cnty. Bd. of Health

    No. 22A-PL-2944 (Ind. App. Feb. 7, 2024)

    [¶16] "A trial court's decision to grant or deny a motion to continue a trial date is reviewed for an abuse of discretion, and there is a strong presumption the trial court properly exercised its discretion." Blackford v. Boone Cnty. Area Plan Comm'n, 43 N.E.3d 655, 664 (Ind.Ct.App. 2015).

  6. G.W. v. Ind. Dep't of Child Servs.

    No. 22A-JT-2649 (Ind. App. Sep. 28, 2023)

    Blackford v. Boone Cnty. Area Plan Comm'n, 43 N.E.3d 655, 664 (Ind.Ct.App. 2015) (internal citations and quotations omitted).

  7. A.H. v. Ind. Dep't of Child Servs.

    No. 22A-JC-3108 (Ind. App. May. 3, 2023)

    Id. (citing Blackford v. Boone County Area Plan Com'n, 43 N.E.3d 655, 664 (Ind.Ct.App. 2015)). [¶8] At a certain point in the proceedings, however, the continuances and delays no longer relied on the requisite finding of good cause.

  8. Smedley v. Arbuckle

    No. 22A-CT-1903 (Ind. App. May. 1, 2023)

    See Blackford v. Boone Cnty. Area Plan Comm'n, 43 N.E.3d 655, 664 (Ind.Ct.App. 2015)

  9. T.H. v. Ind. Dep't of Child Servs. (In re G.H.)

    No. 22A-JC-2643 (Ind. App. Apr. 6, 2023)

    There are no "mechanical tests" for determining whether a request for a continuance was made for good cause. SeeBlackford v. Boone County Area Plan Com'n, 43 N.E.3d 655, 664 (Ind.Ct.App. 2015).

  10. C.U.R. v. Ind. Dep't of Child Servs. (In re A.D.P.R.)

    No. 22A-JT-403 (Ind. App. Sep. 30, 2022)

    "[A] motion for continuance should be made at the earliest practicable time after knowledge of the necessity for a continuance" is acquired. Blackford v. Boone Cnty. Area Plan Comm'n, 43 N.E.3d 655, 664 (Ind.Ct.App. 2015) (citing Clodfelder v. Walker, 234 Ind. 219, 222, 125 N.E.2d 799, 800 (1955)). If Mother believed that DCS's pretrial submissions were too voluminous and/or tardy (which the supplemental discovery apparently was not), she should have asked the trial court to continue the hearing at the earliest available opportunity.